Component traceability
In watchmaking especially, every part needs to be precisely tracked — manual tracking multiplies the risk of error and information loss.
In watchmaking as in assembly or series production, the risk isn't running short of orders — it's losing precision or traceability because tracking still relies on spreadsheets, manual re-entry, or an underused CRM. A poor connection between your tools increases errors, information loss and processing delays.
In watchmaking especially, every part needs to be precisely tracked — manual tracking multiplies the risk of error and information loss.
Schedules, assembly orders and parts availability that don't talk to each other slow down the chain, often without an obvious cause.
A CRM or ERP that's installed but poorly configured, never really adopted by the teams, delivers almost no benefit — tools that exist without being useful.
The method doesn't change by industry: start from what's in place, measure the risks, then act — never the other way around.
In watchmaking, precision subcontracting or series production, traceability needs to stay reliable at every step. A poor connection between your tools increases errors, information loss and processing delays.
We start by mapping the workflow, spotting the friction points, measuring the risks, then prioritizing actions. The goal is simple: streamline what exists before automating what can be automated, without disrupting workshop habits.
Before any development or tool configuration, we identify what could break — and why.
Risk analysis identifies, evaluates and prioritizes possible failure points. It then guides the right response: simplification, control, targeted automation, or reconfiguring tools.
A poorly configured CRM or an ERP disconnected from the shop floor creates no value. The goal is to put data back where it belongs, reduce re-entry, and make exchanges between production, admin and management more reliable.
I work in French-speaking Switzerland — Le Noirmont, Delémont, Neuchâtel, Geneva — as well as Strasbourg, alongside my work in Haut-Rhin and the Swiss Jura.
Every engagement starts with an audit of what's in place — not a generic template stamped onto your workshop.
Work-order tracking, deadline alerts, synchronization between workshops to reduce downtime.
Audit of your existing CRM or ERP, reconfiguring related automations, and training teams so it's actually used day to day.
Spreadsheets that became unmanageable, aging in-house tools: we evolve what exists gradually, without stopping everything to rebuild.
Component and batch traceability, particularly critical in watchmaking and precision subcontracting.
Free 30 minutes, no commitment
It's a step that identifies, evaluates and prioritizes the weak points of a process — errors, workflow breaks, double data entry — before deciding what to simplify, control or automate. It avoids automating a problem that hasn't been fixed at the source.
Yes. Watchmaking has specific needs around traceability, precision and component tracking — constraints I know firsthand from my cross-border experience in the Swiss Jura.
Yes, that's a frequent request: a poorly configured or underused CRM holds a business back more than it helps. I audit what's in place, then configure or improve the related automations, without necessarily replacing everything.
No, rarely. Most of the time, we connect and evolve your existing internal structures rather than rebuilding everything — it's faster and less risky for production.
Yes. I have real cross-border experience as a developer in Porrentruy, which gives me a direct understanding of Swiss industrial constraints, watchmaking included.
In 30 minutes, we identify what carries the most risk in your workshop or internal tools — and what's genuinely worth automating or modernizing.